Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sheku-Kamara v. Karn

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
581 F. Supp. 582 (1984)


Facts

Benedict Sheku-Kamara, a citizen of Sierra Leone, entered the United States in 1978 as an exchange visitor pursuant to § 101(a)(15)(J) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) to pursue graduate studies at the University of Pennsylvania. Exchange visitors who are admitted under Section 101(a)(15)(J), also known as J-1 status, are subject to a two-year foreign residence requirement mandated by Section 212(e) of the Act before they can apply for permanent residence. In 1979, Mr. Sheku-Kamara married Mrs. Sheku-Kamara (plaintiff), who gave birth to their son in 1980. Shortly thereafter, Mrs. Sheku-Kamara and the son were granted entry into the United States with J-2 status, as dependents of a foreign exchange student. In 1981, Mr. Sheku-Kamara transferred from a government-funded program to a privately funded program, which transfer was made retroactive to 1979. While living in the United States, Mrs. Sheku-Kamara applied to transfer her status from non-immigrant to immigrant. Her application was denied because she had not met the two-year foreign residence requirement. Mrs. Sheku-Kamara sought a declaratory judgment that she and her child were not subject to the two-year foreign residence requirement, because they had entered the country after Mr. Sheku-Kamara had stopped participating in the government funded exchange program.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bechtle, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.