Sheldon v. Kettering Health Network

40 N.E.3d 661 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sheldon v. Kettering Health Network

Ohio Court of Appeals
40 N.E.3d 661 (2015)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Duane Sheldon (defendant), an employee of Kettering Health Network (KHN) (defendant) used KHN’s software system to access the private medical records of his former spouse, Vicki Sheldon (plaintiff). Vicki then filed multiple common-law tort claims, including a negligence per se claim, against Duane and KHN on the ground that they had failed to protect private medical information as required under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). As evidence of the failure, Vicki argued that HIPAA required covered entities to run monthly reports on software systems to ensure there is no improper access of information, which KHN failed to do. KHN moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that because HIPAA does not allow private right of actions, Vicki should not be permitted to file tort claims in response to HIPAA violations. The trial court granted the motion, and Vicki appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership