Shelksohn v. Yeh

281 P.3d 1218 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shelksohn v. Yeh

Nevada Supreme Court
281 P.3d 1218 (2009)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Johnna Shelksohn had an immediate seizure when Dr. Yun Szo Yeh (defendant) gave her an epidural during labor. Doctors delivered the baby successfully by caesarean section, but Johnna became comatose and died seven days later. Her husband, Christopher Shelksohn (plaintiff), sued Dr. Yeh for wrongful death, claiming that he failed to administer a test dose and wait for an adverse reaction before giving Johnna the full dosage. Dr. Yeh testified that he gave a test dose, waited, and then gave the full dose. However, the nurse present, Renee Clark, testified that Johnna went into convulsions within ten seconds of Dr. Yeh inserting the epidural needle into her spine, and that normally a doctor waits at least one to two minutes after giving a test dose to give the full dose. But Clark could not see how much Yeh administered or whether he paused at all because she was in front of Johnna. Another nurse, Nannette Spector, claimed that Clark told her in the elevator shortly afterward “that Dr. Yeh had administered a big bolus of drug into Johnna Pullen and she seized immediately.” Clark did not recall that conversation, so Shelksohn tried to use Spector’s testimony as impeachment evidence. But the trial court excluded it, reasoning Shelksohn never asked Clark about the substance of the elevator conversation, so it was not inconsistent with her testimony. After a two-week trial, the jury found for Yeh. Shelksohn appealed, arguing the trial court should have admitted the elevator remark as impeachment evidence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

Dissent (Pickering, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership