Shepard v. United States

290 U.S. 96 (1933)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shepard v. United States

United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 96 (1933)

Play video

Facts

Charles Shepard (defendant) was an army doctor who was married to Zenana Shepard. Charles had an affair with Grace Brandon. Charles told Grace he wanted to marry her, but Zenana refused to grant a divorce. Charles obtained mercury, a poison. He gave Zenana some bootleg whiskey to drink, and she became seriously ill. Charles told people that Zenana must have reacted to impurities in the whiskey. Two days later, Zenana told a nurse, Clara Brown, “Dr. Shepard has poisoned me.” At the time Zenana spoke, she had improved significantly from her initial illness and was expected to recover. After making the accusation, Zenana expressed hope for recovery to her doctor. However, Zenana’s condition worsened, and she died a few weeks later. An autopsy showed mercury in Zenana’s system. After Zenana’s death, Charles proposed to Brandon. Federal prosecutors charged Charles with murdering Zenana. At trial, Charles claimed that the mercury in Zenana’s body came from medicine another doctor administered during her illness and that Zenana was suicidal and might have taken her own life. The prosecutor called nurse Brown, who told jurors about Zenana’s accusation that Charles had poisoned her. This statement was offered for its truth, to show that Charles had poisoned Zenana, and the defense objected that it was inadmissible hearsay. The district court found that the statement was Zenana’s dying declaration and allowed Brown’s testimony. The jury convicted Charles. The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the conviction, ruling that Zenana’s statement was not a dying declaration but that it was admissible under the state-of-mind exception to the hearsay rule in order to rebut the claim Zenana was suicidal. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 789,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership