Sherman v. Burke Contracting, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
891 F.2d 1527 (1990)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Willie Lewis Sherman (plaintiff) complained to the government that his former employer, Burke Contracting, Inc., and its owner, William Burke (defendants), were guilty of racial discrimination. After leaving Burke's company, Sherman worked for Wade Palmer. When Palmer fired Sherman, Sherman secretly tape-recorded Palmer. On tape, Palmer said that Burke persuaded him to fire Sherman, in retaliation for Sherman's complaint to the government. Sherman sued Burke for damages arising from the Palmer firing. At the jury trial, Palmer denied having any contact with Burke concerning Sherman. Sherman then introduced the tape recording into evidence. Burke did not object to the tape's introduction or try to limit the purpose for which the tape was introduced. Burke appealed the trial verdict to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Burke contended that the tape contained hearsay and should not have been admitted into evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.