Sherman v. United States
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 369 (1958)
Facts
A government informer met Sherman (defendant) at a drug rehabilitation center. Sherman had a nine-year-old conviction for selling drugs and a five-year-old conviction for possession of drugs. The informer and Sherman continued to run into each other at other places around town. Eventually, they became friendly and learned that the other was also trying to recover from a narcotics addiction. However, at one point the informer began asking Sherman if he knew a place to buy drugs. After repeated inquiries, and only after the informer told Sherman how much pain he was in, did Sherman finally agree to acquire drugs for himself as well as for the informer. After his arrest, the police searched Sherman’s apartment but no drugs were found. The jury decided that Sherman’s hesitancy at complying with the informer’s inquiry was not an indication of his reluctance to buy drugs, but rather was simply the natural hesitancy of one associated with the sale of narcotics. Sherman was convicted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Warren, C.J.)
Concurrence (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 708,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
