Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sherman v. United States

356 U.S. 369 (1958)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Sherman v. United States

United States Supreme Court

356 U.S. 369 (1958)

Play video

Facts

A government informer met Sherman (defendant) at a drug rehabilitation center. Sherman had a nine-year-old conviction for selling drugs and a five-year-old conviction for possession of drugs. The informer and Sherman continued to run into each other at other places around town. Eventually, they became friendly and learned that the other was also trying to recover from a narcotics addiction. However, at one point the informer began asking Sherman if he knew a place to buy drugs. After repeated inquiries, and only after the informer told Sherman how much pain he was in, did Sherman finally agree to acquire drugs for himself as well as for the informer. After his arrest, the police searched Sherman’s apartment but no drugs were found. The jury decided that Sherman’s hesitancy at complying with the informer’s inquiry was not an indication of his reluctance to buy drugs, but rather was simply the natural hesitancy of one associated with the sale of narcotics. Sherman was convicted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Warren, C.J.)

Concurrence (Frankfurter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership