Shields v. Gross
New York Court of Appeals
58 N.Y.2d 338, 461 N.Y.S.2d 254, 448 N.E.2d 108 (1983)
- Written by Sarah Larkin, JD
Facts
Gross (defendant) took nude photographs of Shields (plaintiff) when she was a minor. Shields’s mother provided unrestricted consent for the use of the photographs. The photographs were used in many magazines and other mediums without incident. However, Shields became disturbed when they appeared in one particular French magazine she did not like. Shields filed suit, seeking damages and an injunction against Gross’s further use of the photographs. The trial court granted Shields a preliminary injunction. However, after a jury trial, the trial court ruled that the consent was unrestricted and dismissed the complaint. However, the trial court also granted Shields relief based upon the parties’ stipulation that Gross would not use the photographs in pornographic or other similar magazines. Shields appealed. The Appellate Division granted Shields a permanent injunction and enjoined Gross’s use of the photographs for advertising or trade. Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simons, J.)
Dissent (Jasen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.