Shuck v. State

349 A.2d 378 (1975)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shuck v. State

Maryland Court of Special Appeals
349 A.2d 378 (1975)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Mark Shuck (defendant) and John Jackman were out drinking. After midnight, the two were stopped at a light in Jackman’s Corvette when a GTO pulled up and then peeled out when the light turned green. The Corvette took off in pursuit. When the GTO turned onto a side road, the Corvette followed suit, cutting off a pickup truck. Its driver, George Parker, who was returning home from his own evening of drinking, slammed on his brakes to avoid the Corvette and hit his head on his windshield. Furious, Parker began pursuit. Both sports cars stopped in a small, single-entrance courtyard. GTO driver Buddy Voelker got out and began a friendly conversation. Parker arrived, parked his truck across the exit, and started a fight. Parker and Jackman were struggling with each other when Voelker jumped on them. Shuck said he tried to pull Voelker from the pile, and Voelker grabbed Shuck and allegedly hit him several times. Shuck retrieved a baseball bat from the Corvette and swung at least twice, injuring Parker slightly and killing Voelker. A girlfriend who saw Jackman shortly afterward said he was bleeding from his mouth and nose and had strangulation marks around his neck. Shuck was convicted of second-degree murder and assault with intent to murder. Shuck appealed, arguing that the judge should have allowed the jury to decide whether imperfect self-defense provided a mitigating circumstance that would reduce the murder charge to manslaughter and exculpate him for assault with murderous intent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moylan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership