Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Shull v. B.F. Goodrich Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals
477 N.E.2d 924 (1985)


Facts

Everett Shull, Sr. (plaintiff), a commercial truck driver, was sent by his employer to a plant owned by B.F. Goodrich Company (Goodrich) (defendant) to pick up a load of tires. While on Goodrich’s dock, Shull was injured when a dock-plate—a mechanical device that forms a bridge between the dock and the truck trailer—malfunctioned and struck Shull. Shull and his wife, Lapaloma, (plaintiff) filed suit against Goodrich for negligence and loss of consortium. At the close of the evidence, the trial court refused the Shull’s request to instruct the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, because it concluded that the Shulls failed to present sufficient evidence that: (1) Shull’s injury was proximately caused by the occurrence, (2) the cause of the occurrence was under the exclusive control of Goodrich at the time, and (3) the occurrence was the sort that would not normally occur in the absence of negligence. The jury held for Goodrich. The Shulls appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.