Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 147 (1969)
- Written by Richard Lavigne, JD
Facts
Fred Shuttlesworth (defendant), an African-American church minister, applied for a parade permit in the city of Birmingham, Alabama (plaintiff). A city ordinance conferred discretionary authority upon a city commission to approve or deny parade permit applications. In spite of the commission’s refusal to grant a permit, Shuttlesworth joined 51 other African-Americans in a march along the streets of Birmingham. After four blocks, the marchers were stopped and arrested. Shuttlesworth was convicted of violating the parade-permit ordinance and sentenced to 90 days hard labor plus an additional 48 days for failure to pay the associated fine. Shuttlesworth appealed the conviction in state court. The state court of appeals concluded that the city ordinance violated First Amendment free-speech protections and vacated the conviction. The state supreme court held that the ordinance was not unconstitutional when narrowly construed and applied. The state supreme court reinstated Shuttlesworth’s conviction. Shuttlesworth petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.