Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Sias v. Edge Communications, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
 8 P.3d 182 (2000)


Facts

Edge Communications, Inc. (Edge) (defendant) sold long-distance phone cards. The cards were disposable and sold in all 50 states. Edge advertised a rate of $.19 per minute but rounded minutes up and charged additional fees. The cards’ design and packaging did not disclose these additional charges. Michael Sias (plaintiff) brought a class action on behalf of all United States purchasers of Edge’s phone cards, alleging fraud and misrepresentations. Edge opposed Sias’s motion for class certification. Edge argued that the phone cards differed in design, denomination, and advertising, which differentiated the claims of individual class members. Edge also asserted that over four million cards had been sold and that the burden of managing a very large class would be massively expensive. Edge also argued that there were due-process problems associated with applying Oklahoma law to class members in other states. The trial court declined to certify Sias’s class because of the cost, administrative burden, and due-process problems with proceeding on a class-wide basis. The court held that the severe drawbacks of class-action litigation outweighed the very small recoveries class members stood to gain. The district court did not decide issues of commonality, typicality, or adequate representation but held only that class-action litigation was not the superior method of adjudication. Sias appealed, arguing the trial court had abused its discretion.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Buettner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.