Sidden v. Mailman

529 S.E.2d 266 (2000)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sidden v. Mailman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina
529 S.E.2d 266 (2000)

SC

Facts

Judy Sidden (plaintiff) and Richard Mailman (defendant) were married. Sidden and Mailman separated and began discussing the distribution of their marital assets. Mailman drafted a list of all of the couple’s assets. Sidden and Mailman agreed on the distribution of the assets and signed an agreement to that effect. Sidden and Mailman then divorced. Mailman had omitted from the list of assets his retirement account, which was worth $158,100. Mailman claimed that the omission was inadvertent. Sidden brought suit, challenging the validity of the distribution agreement. Sidden claimed that Mailman’s omission of the retirement account from the list of assets constituted fraud. The trial court found in favor of Mailman, holding that Sidden’s fraud claim must fail, because she had not pled breach of fiduciary duty. Sidden appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership