Siegel v. HSBC North America Holdings, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
933 F.3d 217 (2019)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) perpetrated terrorist attacks in Amman, Jordan. Injured American nationals and representatives of those killed (plaintiffs) sued HSBC North America Holdings, Inc., and HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (collectively HSBC) (defendants) under the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA). The victims claimed HSBC indirectly aided and abetted the attacks by providing financial services to Al Rahji Bank (ARB), a prominent Saudi bank with known links to AQI and other terrorist organizations. For 25 years, HSBC had provided banking services to ARB. The complaint said HSBC provided nearly $1 billion in funding to ARB, helped it circumvent US regulators, and made conclusory allegations that HSBC meant those funds to go to terrorist organizations. But HSBC had completely ceased doing business with ARB 10 months before the attacks. The trial court dismissed for failure to state a claim. The victims appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sack, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.