Siegel v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
California Court of Appeal
79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 726 (1998)

- Written by Emily Pokora, JD
Facts
Howard Siegel (plaintiff) entered an employment contract with James Dinges and Prudential Insurance Company of America (employers) (defendants). The contract included a provision agreeing that employment disputes were to be arbitrated before the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD). A dispute arose, and Siegel brought suit against the employers for wrongful termination, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. The employers petitioned the trial court to compel arbitration and stay litigation, which was granted. At arbitration, an award was issued in favor of Siegel for compensatory and punitive damages. Siegel sought to affirm the award in trial court. The employers moved to vacate the award, arguing that by awarding punitive damages absent sufficient evidence, the NASD acted in “manifest disregard of [the] law.” The employers claimed that although California Code of Civil Procedure § 1286.2 prohibited judicial review of arbitration awards, the United States Arbitration Act (USAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 10 and 12, preempted state law and allowed the trial court to vacate the award. The trial court upheld the arbitration award, and the employers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Turner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.