Sierra Club, Inc. v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
95 Cal. App. 3d 495, 157 Cal. Rptr. 190 (1979)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The North Coast Regional Commission granted Moores Associates, a real estate developer, a permit to construct a subdivision and condominiums in a scenic coastal area. The Sierra Club, Inc. (plaintiff) unsuccessfully appealed that decision to the California Coastal Commission. Sierra then filed a petition for a writ of mandate against both commissions (defendants) to set aside the permit. Sierra amended its petition to add Moores as a real party in interest. The trial court dismissed Moores from the suit without prejudice because the action against it was untimely under the public resource code. And because the trial court found that Moores was an indispensable party to the action, it also dismissed the commissions. Sierra appealed and argued that Moores was not an indispensable party and even if it was, Sierra’s failure to timely join Moores did not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rouse, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
