United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
657 F.2d 298 (1981)
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) adopted a rule to govern emissions from coal burning power plants pursuant to the 1977 Amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA). After the comment period was closed, the EPA received almost 300 late comment submissions, which it accepted and entered into the administrative docket. In the post-comment period, the EPA also engaged in ex parte communications with interested parties, legislators, and the president’s staff. The EPA inadvertently failed to docket one meeting with Senate staff. In addition, the EPA did not docket a meeting with White House officials. The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (plaintiff) challenged part of the final regulation on the ground that the EPA would have adopted a stricter standard for emissions if it had not engaged in such communications after the close of the comment period.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ward, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 199,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.