Sierra Club v. Department of the Interior

376 F. Supp. 90 (1974)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sierra Club v. Department of the Interior

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
376 F. Supp. 90 (1974)

Facts

The National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 stated that the National Park Service should promote measures consistent with the purpose of conserving the natural objects within national parks for the enjoyment of future generations. In 1968, Congress enacted the Redwood National Park Act (RNPA), which established Redwood National Park (park) with the goal of preserving examples of primeval redwood forest. The RNPA empowered the secretary of the interior (secretary) to acquire interests in land and to execute contracts with landowners to provide as much protection as reasonably possible for the timber, soil, and streams within the park. The designated area of the park and areas near the park included some private lands, which were being logged. The Sierra Club (SC) (plaintiff) asked the secretary to stop the logging. The secretary asked for the logging companies to stop voluntarily but did nothing more. The SC then sued the Department of the Interior (department) (defendant) in district court, arguing that logging upstream and uphill from the park left the park vulnerable to mudslides and other hazards. The department filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sweigert, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership