Sierra Club v. Georgia Power Co.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
365 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (2004)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) (defendant) operated the Wansley steam-electric generating plant (Wansley plant) in Heard County, Georgia. The Wansley plant was one of the largest power plants in the country. In 2000, Georgia Power wished to construct new power-generation units at the Wansley plant that would increase nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. As required by the Clean Air Act (CAA), Georgia had adopted and obtained Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approval for a state implementation plan (SIP) for attaining and maintaining national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). NAAQS were maximum allowable levels of certain air pollutants, including NOx. Georgia’s SIP required that the owner or operator of any new or modified stationary source of NOx emissions obtain emissions offsets prior to operation. Emissions offsets were reductions in NOx emissions from other major stationary sources of NOx emissions in the area. To allow for the construction of a new or modified source, the owner or operator had to apply for an amendment to their Title V permit, which incorporated requirements under the CAA, including SIP requirements. Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division (EPD) amended Georgia Power’s Title V permit to allow for the proposed construction. The amended permit required Georgia power to obtain 457.9 tons of NOx emission offsets from its other emission sources for the 2002 ozone season. Georgia Power obtained amendments to its Bowen Plant Permit (Bowen Permit). The Bowen Plant reduced emissions below the 457.9-ton limit during the 2002 ozone season. The EPD gave Georgia Power corresponding credit for the Wansley Plant’s new NOx emissions for the 2002 ozone season. Sierra Club (plaintiff) filed a citizen suit challenging that Georgia Power’s offsets did not comply with the CAA. Georgia Power moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Camp, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.