Sierra Club v. Georgia Power Co.

365 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sierra Club v. Georgia Power Co.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
365 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (2004)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) (defendant) operated the Wansley steam-electric generating plant (Wansley plant) in Heard County, Georgia. The Wansley plant was one of the largest power plants in the country. In 2000, Georgia Power wished to construct new power-generation units at the Wansley plant that would increase nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. As required by the Clean Air Act (CAA), Georgia had adopted and obtained Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approval for a state implementation plan (SIP) for attaining and maintaining national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). NAAQS were maximum allowable levels of certain air pollutants, including NOx. Georgia’s SIP required that the owner or operator of any new or modified stationary source of NOx emissions obtain emissions offsets prior to operation. Emissions offsets were reductions in NOx emissions from other major stationary sources of NOx emissions in the area. To allow for the construction of a new or modified source, the owner or operator had to apply for an amendment to their Title V permit, which incorporated requirements under the CAA, including SIP requirements. Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division (EPD) amended Georgia Power’s Title V permit to allow for the proposed construction. The amended permit required Georgia power to obtain 457.9 tons of NOx emission offsets from its other emission sources for the 2002 ozone season. Georgia Power obtained amendments to its Bowen Plant Permit (Bowen Permit). The Bowen Plant reduced emissions below the 457.9-ton limit during the 2002 ozone season. The EPD gave Georgia Power corresponding credit for the Wansley Plant’s new NOx emissions for the 2002 ozone season. Sierra Club (plaintiff) filed a citizen suit challenging that Georgia Power’s offsets did not comply with the CAA. Georgia Power moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Camp, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership