Sierra Club v. Lujan
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
36 Envt. Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1533 (1993)
- Written by Erin Enser, JD
Facts
The fountain darter was a listed species under the Endangered Species Act, and it existed only at the San Marcos Springs and the Comal Springs, downstream from the Edwards Aquifer, near San Antonio, Texas. Pumping water from the aquifer upstream reduced the outflow at both springs. The secretary of the interior (the secretary) (defendant) developed, but failed to implement, a recovery plan for the fountain darter at the San Marcos Springs. The secretary did not develop or implement a recovery plan for the fountain darter at the Comal Springs. The Sierra Club (plaintiff) sued the secretary, arguing that the obligation to develop and implement a recovery plan for a listed species was nondiscretionary pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, and that the secretary’s failure to implement a recovery plan constituted an unlawful take of a listed species. The secretary disagreed, arguing that recovery plans should be discretionary if budget constraints made development and implementation a challenge. The secretary did not argue that a recovery plan would be ineffective in promoting conservation of the fountain darter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bunton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.