Sierra Club v. Lujan

36 Envt. Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1533 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sierra Club v. Lujan

United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
36 Envt. Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1533 (1993)

Facts

The fountain darter was a listed species under the Endangered Species Act, and it existed only at the San Marcos Springs and the Comal Springs, downstream from the Edwards Aquifer, near San Antonio, Texas. Pumping water from the aquifer upstream reduced the outflow at both springs. The secretary of the interior (the secretary) (defendant) developed, but failed to implement, a recovery plan for the fountain darter at the San Marcos Springs. The secretary did not develop or implement a recovery plan for the fountain darter at the Comal Springs. The Sierra Club (plaintiff) sued the secretary, arguing that the obligation to develop and implement a recovery plan for a listed species was nondiscretionary pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, and that the secretary’s failure to implement a recovery plan constituted an unlawful take of a listed species. The secretary disagreed, arguing that recovery plans should be discretionary if budget constraints made development and implementation a challenge. The secretary did not argue that a recovery plan would be ineffective in promoting conservation of the fountain darter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bunton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership