Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Sierra Club v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
110 F.3d 1551 (1997)


Facts

In 1991, the United States Forest Service (USFS) (defendant) proposed to issue timber-cutting contracts to various timber contractors (defendants) on seven land parcels within the Chattahoochee and Oconee National Forests (forests) in the State of Georgia. A coalition of environmental organizations, including the Sierra Club (plaintiffs), challenged the USFS’s timber contracts in district court. The plaintiffs alleged violations of federal statutes, including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Section 707 of the MBTA, 16 U.S.C. § 707, criminalized the taking or killing of migratory birds by a “person, association, partnership, or corporation.” The plaintiffs argued that the timber contracts violated the MBTA, because the contracts authorized timber cutting during the nesting season for migratory birds and would result in the deaths of between 2,000 and 9,000 birds. The plaintiffs also argued that the MBTA’s prohibitions on the taking or killing of migratory birds applied to all entities, including the federal government. The district court held that the timber contracts violated the MBTA, and issued a preliminary injunction ordering the USFS to cease timber-cutting and road-building activities. The USFS and timber contractors appealed the preliminary injunction.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.