Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co.

813 F.2d 1480 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
813 F.2d 1480 (1987)

Facts

The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) largely relied on companies to self-monitor their emissions. It required sampling to be reported, and the person performing the sampling was required to certify that the information in the report was accurate. The Sierra Club (plaintiff) brought a citizen’s suit against Union Oil Co. (defendant) on the grounds that Union Oil’s emissions had exceeded the amount allowed under its NPDES permit 76 times. At trial, the evidence showed that according to Union Oil’s self-monitoring reports, it had exceeded its permitted limits on several occasions. Union Oil argued that several of the NPDES permit violations should be excused because they were due to sampling errors rather than excessive emissions. The district court agreed, holding that Union Oil had not violated its NPDES permit because the reports showing excessive amounts were caused by sampling errors and the emissions limits had not been exceeded. The Sierra Club appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership