Sierra Club v. United States Department of Energy
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
867 F.3d 189 (2017)
- Written by Colette Routel, JD
Facts
The United States Department of Energy (DOE) (defendant) approved a proposal to export liquefied natural gas from the Freeport Terminal, located on an island off the coast of Texas. The Sierra Club (plaintiff) challenged this approval in federal district court. It argued that the DOE failed to adequately analyze the indirect effects and cumulative impacts that exporting natural gas would have on the environment. More specifically, the Sierra Club argued that the environmental-impact statement (EIS) for the project did not thoroughly analyze how authorizing the export of liquefied natural gas might increase production and how that increase in production might impact waterways and ozone concentrations. The DOE admitted that it did not provide the detailed analysis that the Sierra Club sought but claimed that it was not required to do so because the impacts were not concrete and reasonably foreseeable. The district court rejected the Sierra Club’s challenge, and the Sierra Club appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.