Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
874 F.2d 653 (1989)
Facts
Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. (Sierra) (plaintiff) was a family-operated servicer of diesel engines. Sierra was interested in purchasing a posting machine to help with invoicing and bookkeeping. Sierra contacted Burroughs Corporation (Burroughs) (defendant). Burroughs advised Sierra to purchase a B-80 computer rather than a posting machine. Sierra’s owner, James Cathey, was not familiar with computers or contracts, let alone accounting software or bookkeeping devices. Relying on the advice from Burroughs, Cathey signed a sales contract buying the B-80 for Sierra. The contract contained language in all capital letters disclaiming all warranties, including the implied warranty of merchantability and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The disclaimer language appeared on the back of the contracts, and only some of the language was in bold lettering. Sierra soon discovered the B-80 was incapable of performing bookkeeping functions. Sierra had to purchase a new computer from a different company. Sierra sued Burroughs for breach of warranty. Burroughs argued that all warranties were disclaimed by the contract. The district court held that the disclaimer provision was not conspicuous, and that the warranties were not excluded. Burroughs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stephens, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Canby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 711,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
