Sigval Bergeson v. Joseph Muller Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
710 F.2d 928 (1983)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Sigval Bergeson (plaintiff) was a Norwegian ship owner. Bergeson entered into three charter-party agreements with Joseph Muller Corporation (Muller) (defendant), a Swiss business. Each charter-party agreement contained an arbitration clause providing for arbitration in New York. Disputes arose during performance of the agreements, and in 1972 Bergeson filed a demand for arbitration. Arbitration was conducted in New York according to the arbitration clauses, and in 1978 an award was issued in favor of Bergeson. Bergeson filed an action in Switzerland, where Muller was based, to enforce the award. However, the case was delayed for over two years. In December 1981, Bergeson filed a petition in United States federal district court to confirm the award. The district court confirmed the award and entered judgment for Bergeson, finding that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the convention) applied to awards that were issued in the United States but involved foreign parties. Muller appealed, arguing that the convention was not applicable to any arbitral awards made in the United States and that, if the court found that the convention itself could apply, the United States’ statutory implementation of the convention indicated that the convention was not intended to apply in the United States in such circumstances.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cardamone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.