From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...
Sikora v. Wenzel
Ohio Supreme Court
727 N.E.2d 1277 (2000)
Sikora (plaintiff) was injured when a deck attached to a condominium collapsed during a party he was attending. Subsequently, an engineering firm hired by the city concluded that the collapse resulted from improper construction and design, in violation of Ohio Basic Building Code (OBBC) laws. A decade before, Zink Road Manor Investment (Zink) had owned the land on which the condominium building was built. The plans for the building, which included the specifications for the decks, were submitted to and rejected by the City, because they violated the OBBC laws. Zink offered to modify the deck specifications and, based in part on those assurances, received a certificate of occupancy from the city. However, city officials never inspected the decks during construction and received no updated construction plans from Zink. After construction was completed, Wenzel (defendant) purchased the building from Zink. Wenzel had no knowledge of the design and construction issues pertaining to the decks. Sikora filed suit against Wenzel, the contractor, and the design company (defendants), alleging each was jointly and severally liable for negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment in Wenzel’s favor on the basis that he lacked notice of the defect in the deck. Sikora appealed. The court of appeals reversed and held that the notice requirement was irrelevant for purposes of holding Wenzel liable under state law. The Ohio Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cook, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.