Silver v. New York Central Railroad
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
105 N.E.2d 923 (1952)
Frances Silver (plaintiff) was a passenger on a New York Central Railroad (defendant) train during very cold winter weather. Silver's car was detached and siderailed, awaiting reconnection to another locomotive. While it was siderailed, the unheated car grew cold. Silver called the train's porter for help, but her call went unanswered. Silver claimed her prolonged exposure to the cold worsened her preexisting medical condition, and she sued the railroad. At trial, the judge did not allow the porter to testify that eleven other passengers made no complaint about the cold. The judge decided the action in Silver's favor, and the railroad appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, taking exception to the judge's exclusion of the porter's proffered testimony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkins, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.