Silver v. New York Stock Exchange
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 341, 83 S. Ct. 1246, 10 L. Ed. 2d 389 (1963)
- Written by Brett Stavin, JD
Facts
Harold Silver (plaintiff) was the owner of Municipal Securities and Municipal Securities, Inc. (collectively, Municipal) (plaintiffs), firms that traded in municipal bonds and corporate over-the-counter securities, respectively. Municipal was registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) but not a member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) (defendant). Municipal took steps to arrange for direct and private electronic lines of communication (the wires) to be established with a number of securities firms that were NYSE members. In the summer of 1958, the NYSE temporarily approved the wires. However, on February 12, 1959, without any prior notice, the NYSE formally disapproved the wires, which resulted in the NYSE-member firms informing Silver that the wires would be discontinued. The NYSE also informed Silver that Silver would no longer have access to the NYSE’s direct stock-ticker service. The NYSE refused to provide Silver with any reasons for its actions and did not give Silver any opportunities for a hearing to challenge the actions. Removal of the wires adversely impacted Municipal by depriving Municipal of an essential mechanism of instantaneously communicating with NYSE-member securities traders and by imposing a stigma. Silver and Municipal filed suit in federal district court, seeking an injunction against the NYSE on the basis that the NYSE’s actions violated the Sherman Antitrust Act (Sherman Act). The district court ruled in Silver and Municipal’s favor. The NYSE appealed, and the court of appeals reversed. Silver and Municipal then petitioned for certiorari, and the United States Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goldberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.