Silverberg on Behalf of Dendreon Corporation v. Gold

2013 WL 6859282 (2013)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Silverberg on Behalf of Dendreon Corporation v. Gold

Delaware Court of Chancery
2013 WL 6859282 (2013)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Shareholder Herbert Silverberg brought a derivative action on behalf of biotech company Dendreon Corporation (plaintiff) alleging 10 officers and directors including Mitchell Gold (defendants) engaged in insider trading. Dendreon developed an immunotherapy treatment for prostate cancer called Provenge, Dendreon’s only product approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Because Provenge cost $93,000 for a full month-long course of treatment, Dendreon sold it using a “buy and bill” policy. Doctors had to buy Provenge up front, then seek reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid, or private-insurance companies and assume the risk they would deny reimbursement. The FDA approved Provenge in April 2010. Within months, doctors began canceling scheduled infusions due to reimbursement problems. Dendreon began tracking canceled infusions in August 2010. In mid-September, a board presentation identified reimbursement as a key issue and informed the board that providers lacked confidence in reimbursement. The presentation included a sensitivity analysis that concluded reimbursement issues could decrease Dendreon’s revenues by more than $100 million, while improving reimbursement rates would only modestly increase revenues. Six months later, Dendreon’s chief operating officer told the board that a survey found over 65 percent of providers had medium or low confidence in reimbursement for Provenge. In August 2011, the company issued a press release acknowledging reimbursement issues had significantly decreased revenues, causing Dendreon’s stock to drop 67 percent overnight. Meanwhile, officers and directors had already sold over $78 million of their Dendreon stock, including over $56 million within a day of Provenge’s FDA approval. Silverberg claimed the insiders breached fiduciary duties by selling without disclosing known reimbursement problems. The insiders moved to dismiss, arguing Silverberg failed to plead sufficient facts to support a Delaware insider-trading claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parsons, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership