Simblest v. Maynard
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
427 F.2d 1 (1970)
- Written by Matthew Carney, JD
Facts
Simblest (plaintiff) was a citizen of New Hampshire and on a business trip in Burlington, Vermont on November 9, 1965. Maynard (defendant) was a resident of Vermont and a full time fireman for the Burlington, Vermont Fire Department at the time of the accident at issue in this case. On the evening of November 9, Simblest was approaching the intersection of Main Street and South Willard Street in Burlington. According to his testimony, Simblest approached the intersection where a green light was in his favor. Approximately halfway through crossing the intersection, Simblest claims the power to the traffic signal went out. While he was passing through the intersection, a fire engine driven by Maynard with its sirens on hit Simblest. Maynard and other witnesses claim that the power to the traffic signal had been out for ten to fifteen minutes before Simblest entered the intersection. Simblest sued Maynard. At trial, Maynard made motions for a directed verdict both at the conclusion of Simblest’s case in chief as well as at the conclusion of the presentation of evidence. Both were denied. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Simblest. Maynard made a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was granted by the trial court, setting aside the verdict. Simblest appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timbers, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.