Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Simmons v. Porter

Kansas Supreme Court
312 P.3d 345 (2013)


Facts

Adam Simmons (plaintiff) worked as a vehicle mechanic for Richard and Sarah Porter (defendants). Simmons was working on a truck’s loose fuel tank when the tank fell and covered Simmons in gasoline. When this occurred, Simmons moved away from the tank, and in doing so he broke a shop light, causing a fire. Simmons was badly burned. Simmons brought suit against the Porters for failing to provide a safe workspace. The district court found in favor of the Porters based on the common law affirmative defense of assumption of the risk. The court of appeals affirmed. Simmons appealed, arguing that the state legislature’s adoption of comparative fault eliminated the doctrine of assumption of the risk.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Biles, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 252,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.