Simmons v. Porter
Kansas Supreme Court
312 P.3d 345 (2013)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Adam Simmons (plaintiff) worked as a vehicle mechanic for Richard and Sarah Porter (defendants). Simmons was working on a truck’s loose fuel tank when the tank fell and covered Simmons in gasoline. When this occurred, Simmons moved away from the tank, and in doing so he broke a shop light, causing a fire. Simmons was badly burned. Simmons brought suit against the Porters for failing to provide a safe workspace. The district court found in favor of the Porters based on the common law affirmative defense of assumption of the risk. The court of appeals affirmed. Simmons appealed, arguing that the state legislature’s adoption of comparative fault eliminated the doctrine of assumption of the risk.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Biles, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.