Simmons v. United States

390 U.S. 377 (1968)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Simmons v. United States

United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 377 (1968)

Play video

Facts

Simmons, Andrews, and Garrett (defendants) were suspected of committing an armed robbery of a savings and loan association. The robbery occurred in the afternoon and lasted about five minutes. The next day, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents presented at least six snapshots of Simmons and Andrews to the five bank employees who witnessed the robbery. All five witnesses identified Simmons. Some time later, photos of Garrett were presented to the witnesses, and three witnesses identified Garrett as the other robber. The photos were not introduced into evidence, but the witnesses all identified Simmons in court as a robber. A jury convicted Simmons, Andrews, and Garrett. The appellate court affirmed the convictions of Simmons and Garrett but reversed Andrews's conviction. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari as to Simmons and Garrett. Simmons contended, among other things, that his pretrial identification was so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to misidentification that it violated his due-process rights.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership