Simmons v. United States

308 F.2d 160 (1962)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Simmons v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
308 F.2d 160 (1962)

Facts

American Brewery, Inc. sponsored a fishing contest. One fish in the Chesapeake Bay, called Diamond Jim, was given a special identification tag. Anybody who caught the fish and presented it to the brewery, together with the identification tag and an affidavit, would be entitled to a cash prize of $25,000.00. These rules were well-publicized. William Simmons (plaintiff) caught the prized fish. Although Simmons knew about the contest, he did not set out to catch the prized fish. After catching the fish, Simmons quickly complied with the conditions of the contest. The brewery awarded Simmons the $25,000 prize. The Internal Revenue Service sought to have the $25,000 included in Simmons’ gross income, thus rendering the prize taxable. Simmons argued that the prize was not taxable on the ground that the prize was given to him as a gift. Simmons brought suit against the government (defendant) in federal court. The trial court ruled in favor of the government. Simmons appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sobeloff, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership