Simons v. Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery
2022 WL 223464 (2022)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
GrafTech International, Ltd. (GrafTech) (defendant) repurchased stock from its corporate parent, Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. (Brookfield), on terms that GrafTech shareholder Steven Simons (plaintiff) considered unfair. To undo the deal, Simons sued Brookfield and GrafTech in the Delaware Court of Chancery. Simons alleged that it would have been futile to demand that GrafTech sue Brookfield in GrafTech’s own right, because four of GrafTech’s nine directors were clearly compromised by their ties to Brookfield and because GrafTech’s other five directors either had mutually beneficial dealings with each other or were otherwise incapable of exercising disinterested and independent judgment regarding a litigation demand. Brookfield and GrafTech moved to dismiss on the grounds that Simons failed to satisfy the demand precondition for shareholder derivative litigation. As a threshold matter, the court brushed aside Simons’s contention that the GrafTech board engineered the ninth director’s appointment solely to sabotage Simons’s demand-futility claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McCormick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.