From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
Simons v. Miami Beach First National Bank
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 81, 85 S. Ct. 1315, 14 L. Ed. 2d 232 (1965)
Facts
The wife of a New York married couple obtained a New York separation agreement that included an award of monthly alimony. Thereafter, the husband moved to Florida, where he obtained an ex parte divorce. The wife, who had only constructive notice of the Florida divorce proceeding, did not enter a personal appearance. After the husband died, the executor of his estate offered the husband’s will for probate in a Florida probate court. The wife appeared in the Florida probate proceeding and elected to take her dower share under Florida law instead of taking under the will, which made no provision for her. The executor contested the dower claim and argued that because the couple was divorced when the husband died, the wife had no dower interest under Florida law. The wife argued that the Florida divorce decree—as it pertained to her dower rights—should be set aside because she did not appear in that action, so the court lacked personal jurisdiction over her to make any ruling about her marital rights beyond her marital status. The Florida trial and appellate courts rejected her argument, and the Florida Supreme Court declined to hear her appeal. The wife then appealed to the United States Supreme Court and argued that the lower court decisions unconstitutionally denied her dower claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.