Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sims v. Greene

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
160 F.2d 512 (1947)


Facts

David Sims (plaintiff) filed a complaint to obtain injunctive relief against Sherman Greene (defendant) in federal district court. Sims alleged that Greene was misrepresenting himself as the presiding bishop of the First Episcopal District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church and attempting to function as the presiding bishop to the detriment of Sims, who was the actual presiding bishop. On December 2, 1946, the district court issued an order restraining Greene from interfering with Sims as presiding bishop. The original order was set to expire on December 22, 1946. The district court then extended the original order by 10 days, and then extended the order again with Greene’s consent to January 14, 1947. On December 24, 1946, Greene filed an answer, alleging that Sims had been defrocked and that Greene had been assigned as presiding bishop. On January 13, 1947, the district court extended the restraining order once more, this time without Greene’s consent. On January 17, 1947, Greene moved to dissolve the restraint. The district court directed Greene to withhold his motion. Greene appealed from the restraining order, arguing that the so-called temporary restraining order issued by the district court was in fact an illegal preliminary injunction issued without the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Biggs, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.