Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • S
  • Sinclair Oil Corp. v. LevienSinclair Oil Corp. v. Levien
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Levien

Delaware Supreme Court
280 A.2d 717 (Del. 1971)


 

Facts

Sinclair Oil Corp. (Sinclair) (defendant) owned about 97 percent of the stock of its subsidiary, Sinclair Venezuelan Oil Company (Sinven) (plaintiff). From 1960 to 1966, Sinclair caused Sinven to pay out $108 million in dividends, which was more than Sinven earned during the time period. The dividends were made in compliance with law on their face, but Sinven contended that Sinclair caused the dividends to be paid out simply because Sinclair was in need of cash at the time. In addition, in 1961 Sinclair caused Sinven to contract with Sinclair International Oil Company (International), another Sinclair subsidiary created to coordinate Sinclair’s foreign business. Under the contract, Sinven agreed to sell its crude oil to International. International, however, consistently made late payments and did not comply with minimum purchase requirements under the contract. Sinven brought suit against its parent, Sinclair, for the damages it sustained as a result of the dividends, as well as breach of the contract with International. The Delaware Court of Chancery applied the intrinsic fairness standard and found in favor of Sinven on both claims. Sinclair appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wolcott, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


How Sinclair reaped the benefits from the oil contract between the subsidiary companies?

Want to see this answer?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and get access to all answers in our Q&A database

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Tempor minim nulla id mollit ullamco consequat aliquip adipisicing irure officia tempor. Magna sit eiusmod laborum proident laboris ex sunt. Non labore ex officia irure qui et laboris aliqua in minim. Labore velit aliqua proident officia cillum occaecat dolore tempor. Ullamco in consequat labore amet laborum proident reprehenderit anim cillum excepteur. Elit do nostrud nisi excepteur sit dolor pariatur fugiat. Nisi incididunt incididunt do est velit excepteur enim excepteur incididunt mollit pariatur. Irure tempor non in esse do. Laboris eiusmod in ad ut enim est duis ad sint veniam eiusmod.