Sinclair Refining Co. v. Shakespeare
Colorado Supreme Court
175 P.2d 389 (1946)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Shakespeare (defendant) leased property owned by Sinclair Refining Co. (plaintiff) for a five-year term. About a month prior to the lease expiration, Shakespeare informed Sinclair that it would remove all of its equipment from the property within 30 days. Shakespeare, however, remained in possession even after the lease expired. After two months had passed and Shakespeare still had not vacated the property, Sinclair informed Shakespeare that it would be treated as a holdover tenant for a new five-year term, and requested the so-far overdue rent. Shakespeare denied Sinclair’s right to extend the lease for another five-year term, and subsequently vacated the property, paying rent for the four-month holdover period. Later, Sinclair filed suit against Shakespeare seeking rent for the full year following expiration, contending that Shakespeare was bound by the lease extension after holding over. The trial court found in Sinclair’s favor, awarding Sinclair one year’s rent. The court also entered a declaratory judgment that Shakespeare was bound for another five-year term by Sinclair’s election. Shakespeare appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.