Sinclair v. Sinclair

914 N.E.2d 1084 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sinclair v. Sinclair

Ohio Court of Appeals
914 N.E.2d 1084 (2009)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 2008, Charles Sinclair (defendant) was arrested after a physical altercation with his wife, Tracy Sinclair (plaintiff). Shortly after Charles’s arrest, Tracy filed a petition for a civil protection order against Charles. The trial court issued an ex parte civil protection order. A hearing was then held by a county-court magistrate judge. At the hearing, Tracy sought a five-year civil protection order and testified that Charles had continuously physically and sexually abused her. Neither party mentioned that a divorce action was pending during the hearing. After the hearing, the magistrate judge recommended a six-month civil protection order. The magistrate judge based the recommendation on the ground that a divorce action was pending and, after the conclusion of the divorce action, the Sinclairs would have no reason to contact each other. Tracy appealed the recommendation, and the trial court considered the case. The trial court concluded that the magistrate judge was correct in determining that a five-year civil protection order was unnecessary because of the pending divorce action. However, the trial court extended the civil protection order to one year to ensure that it lasted until the divorce decree was finalized. Tracy appealed to the Ohio Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McFarland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership