Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Singer v. Singer

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
634 P.2d 766 (1981)


Facts

The Singer family created an oil production partnership, Josaline Production Co., in the late 1930s. Over the years, partnership interests were conveyed and passed down to other family members. Andrea and Stanley Singer (defendants) are members in the partnership, as is Joe L. Singer (plaintiff). In 1977 Josaline’s partnership agreement was re-drafted. Paragraph 8 of the re-drafted partnership agreement states that any partner may conduct his business as if he were not a member of the partnership, that individual partners are free to enter into business transactions that conflict or compete with the partnership’s business, and that other partners may not claim an interest in such transactions. Shortly before a 1979 partnership meeting, Joe L. asked Stanley to look into purchasing 95 acres of mineral land for the partnership. The possible purchase was discussed at the partners’ meeting, but no decision was made. After the meeting, Stanley and Andrea formed a general partnership realty company and purchased the 95 acres without consulting any of the Josaline partners. Joe L. brought suit, claiming that based on the fiduciary duties of partners Josaline was entitled to participate in the land purchase. The district court agreed, finding that the land purchased by Stanley and Andrea is held in constructive trust for the partnership.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Boydston, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.