Singh v. United Cerebral Palsy of N.Y.C., Inc.

896 N.Y.S.2d 22 (2010)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Singh v. United Cerebral Palsy of N.Y.C., Inc.

Appellate Division of New York
896 N.Y.S.2d 22 (2010)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

Sianna Singh was injured when the automatic swinging doors of any entryway she was walking through closed on her. The doors were located in a building owned and occupied by United Cerebral Palsy of New York City, Inc. (UCP). UCP contracted with Miric Industries Incorporated (Miric) to do repair work as-needed in the building. Miric contracted with Reliable Door Corp. (Reliable) for any repairs needed on the doors. Singh (plaintiff) sued UCP (defendant), arguing that the doors’ automatic motion sensor, mounted over the doors, was defective. Singh asserted the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, arguing that the accident was not the type that would normally occur in the absence of negligence. UCP brought a third-party action against Miric and Reliable. UCP, Miric, and Reliable moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaints against them. The lower court denied the motions, and UCP, Miric, and Reliable appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Richter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms

Related Videos