Sinha v. Sinha

526 A.2d 765 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sinha v. Sinha

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
526 A.2d 765 (1987)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1974, Shrikant Nandan Prasad Sinha (plaintiff) and Chandra Prabha Sinha (defendant) married while living in India. In August 1976, Shrikant moved to the United States without Chandra to obtain a master’s degree. When Shrikant first moved, Shrikant and Chandra communicated frequently and acted as husband and wife. However, in August 1979, Shrikant sought a divorce decree in New Jersey Superior Court. Shrikant dismissed the complaint after Chandra moved from India to Pennsylvania. Shrikant then filed for divorce in a court of common pleas within Pennsylvania in October 1980. After a hearing, the court entered a unilateral, no-fault divorce pursuant to 23 P.S. § 201(d), under which a divorce is granted if the spouses have lived separately for three years and the marriage is irretrievably broken. Chandra appealed on the ground that Section 201(d) required that at least one spouse had an intent to dissolve the marriage at the start of the separation period. The superior court rejected Chandra’s argument and affirmed the lower court. Chandra appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hutchinson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership