Sinisgallo v. Town of Islip Housing Authority
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
865 F. Supp. 2d 307 (2012)
- Written by Nicole Gray , JD
Facts
Kathie Sinisgallo and Steve Tsilimparis (plaintiffs) were tenants of a New York housing project, which was run by the Town of Islip Housing Authority (IHA) (defendant). Sinisgallo and Tsilimparis both suffered from mental illnesses and were receiving psychiatric treatment and Social Security checks as their primary sources of income. IHA leased the pair an apartment in accordance with its public-housing program, which was aimed at providing housing for low-income families or families with elderly or disabled individuals. The pair’s lease began in June 2010, and in May 2011, the two filed a complaint with IHA regarding a neighbor who had allegedly shot their cat with a BB gun. Following the cat incident, Tsilimparis confronted the neighbor and ended up hitting him, bloodying his eye and nose. While criminal proceedings were pending, IHA sent Sinisgallo and Tsilimparis a tenancy-termination notice. The pair requested review of the termination; however, IHA decided to continue with eviction proceedings. Sinisgallo and Tsilimparis appealed and were granted a formal administrative hearing, which took place more than six months after the incident. A private attorney (defendant) acted as the hearing officer, and the pair were represented by counsel and had an opportunity to cross-examine IHA’s witness. Sinisgallo and Tsilimparis’s primary argument was that IHA was required to offer them a reasonable accommodation as disabled tenants in accordance with the Fair Housing Act (FHA) before terminating their tenancy. The pair presented testimony from a social worker who was involved in Tsilimparis’s mental-health treatment who testified that Tsilimparis had a medication adjustment and had begun intense therapy following the incident. The pair requested a probationary period to show that the incident was isolated, resulted from Tsilimparis’s mental illness, and could be prevented with proper medical treatment as it had been for the six months leading up to the hearing. Following the hearing, the pair were found in violation of their lease and IHA proceeded with the eviction process. Sinisgallo and Tsilimparis sued IHA and the hearing officer in a United States district court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Spatt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.