Siriano v. Beth Israel Hospital

161 Misc. 2d 512, 614 N.Y.S.2d 700 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Siriano v. Beth Israel Hospital

New York Supreme Court
161 Misc. 2d 512, 614 N.Y.S.2d 700 (1994)

Facts

Joseph Siriano (plaintiff) was injured in a construction accident. Siriano and others (collectively, Siriano) sued Beth Israel Hospital (hospital) (defendant), which owned the property, and five contractors and subcontractors (collectively, contractors) (defendants). Siriano was White. In connection with jury selection, the court granted nine peremptory challenges to Siriano and 15 peremptory challenges to the hospital and contractors (three peremptory challenges per defendant). As of March 16, 1994, two White jurors were seated, Siriano had peremptorily challenged five prospective jurors (four White and one Black), and the hospital and contractors had peremptorily challenged 11 prospective jurors (nine minorities and two White). The nine stricken minority prospective jurors (six Black and three Latino) were the only minority venirepersons (i.e., prospective jurors) to have been examined to date. The parties also jointly excused approximately 180 prospective jurors whose racial breakdowns were unknown. On March 16, Siriano complained to the court that the hospital and contractors engaged in racial discrimination in striking all the minority prospective jurors to be examined. After hearing arguments, the court concluded that Siriano made a prima facie showing of racial discrimination and ordered the hospital and the contractors to offer race-neutral explanations for their peremptory challenges. The court subsequently rejected the hospital’s and contractors’ proffered explanations. In addition, the court, with counsel, examined the three then-available minority jurors.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lehner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership