Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sisney v. Reisch

754 N.W.2d 813 (2008)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Sisney v. Reisch

South Dakota Supreme Court

754 N.W.2d 813 (2008)

Facts

CBM, Inc. (defendant) had a longstanding contract with the State of South Dakota to provide food service to the state’s department of corrections (DOC) facilities. In 1998, Philip Heftel, an inmate at a DOC facility, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the contract between the state and CBM violated his constitutional right to the free exercise of the Jewish religion by failing to provide a kosher diet. Prior to trial, Heftel and then-secretary of the DOC Jeffrey Bloomberg entered into a settlement agreement (the agreement) that required the DOC to provide a kosher diet to all Jewish inmates who requested it, including prepackaged meals to be served twice daily. In 2007, CBM stopped serving prepackaged kosher meals and began serving a new kosher diet prepared and cooked in the prisons’ kitchens. Charles Sisney (plaintiff), an inmate at a DOC facility, filed an administrative complaint with Douglas Weber (defendant), director of prison operations, alleging that the change in the kosher menu violated the agreement. Weber informed Sisney that Sisney and other inmates were not parties to the agreement and rejected the complaint. Thereafter, Sisney brought suit against Weber and Tim Reisch, secretary of the DOC (collectively defendants) alleging that they had breached the agreement in violation of state law. The trial court dismissed Sisney’s complaint for failing to assert sufficient facts supporting an inference that either Reisch or Weber was responsible for enforcing the agreement. Sisney appealed. The South Dakota Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zinter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership