Sisney v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
754 N.W.2d 639 (2008)
CNB, Inc. (defendant) contracted with the State of South Dakota (defendant) to provide food service to the state’s department of corrections (DOC) facilities. In 2007, CBN began serving a different menu at DOC facilities. Charles Sisney (plaintiff), a Jewish prison inmate who followed a kosher diet as part of his religion, filed an administrative complaint with the DOC alleging that the new menu included kosher meals that averaged 400-500 fewer calories than the minimum required under the state’s contract with CBN. Douglas Weber (defendant), the director of prison operations, rejected Sisney’s complaint. Thereafter, Sisney filed suit against the State, CBN, and Weber (collectively Defendants) alleging that CBN breached its contract with the state by failing to adhere to the correct calorie count in its kosher meals. Sisney claimed he was a third-party beneficiary to the contract. The trial court dismissed Sisney’s complaint for failure to state a claim and held that Sisney lacked standing to sue as a third-party beneficiary. Sisney appealed. The South Dakota Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Zinter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.