Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.

289 S.E.2d 679 (1982)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

289 S.E.2d 679 (1982)

Facts

Patricia Ann Roberson was killed when the pickup truck driven by her husband, James (defendant), collided with a truck driven by Oswald Carter, an employee of Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. (Anchor Motor) (defendant). Arnold Sitzes and Edward Rucks (plaintiffs), administrators of Patricia’s estate, filed suit against defendants in federal district court. Thereafter, defendants filed a third-party complaint for contribution against James Roberson. After a trial, the district court instructed the jury to assign percentages of fault to James Roberson and Anchor Motor if it found that both had been negligent. Patricia was found not to be at fault and was thus excluded from the apportioning. The jury held for plaintiffs and awarded $100,000 in damages. Further, the jury found Anchor Motor 70 percent negligent and James 30 percent negligent. The district court then posed certified questions to the West Virginia Supreme Court, namely to resolve a perceived conflict between the state’s normal rules of contribution, which would apportion damages equally among joint tortfeasors, and the state’s newly-adopted rule of comparative negligence, which required the jury to assign the proportion of the total negligence among the various parties and completely denied recovery to a plaintiff whose negligence equaled or exceeded 50 percent of the combined negligence of the parties.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership