Skidmore v. Swift & Co.

323 U.S. 134 (1944)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Skidmore v. Swift & Co.

United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 134 (1944)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Skidmore v. Swift & Co.

Facts

Skidmore and six others (plaintiffs) (the employees) were employed as firefighters at a packing plant run by Swift & Co. (Swift) (defendant). The employees worked daytime shifts, five days per week. As part of their employment, the employees were also required to stay overnight in the fire hall on the plant’s premises three and one-half to four nights per week. The employees’ overnight duties were to respond to fire alarms. The employees were paid for any time they spent responding to alarms during their overnight stays, but they were not paid for any of their other overnight time. The employees sued Swift under the Fair Labor Standards Act (the act), 29 U.S.C.A. § 201, seeking overtime compensation for the hours they spent overnight at the plant. The trial court referred to an interpretive bulletin issued by the administrator of the United States Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, which included standards and guidance regarding how to interpret the act in various circumstances. The administrator’s guidance suggested applying the act flexibly, based on the degree to which an employee could conduct personal activities during on-call time and the number of consecutive hours the employee was on call without being required to actively work. Nevertheless, the trial court concluded that as a matter of law, the time the employees spent overnight on call in Swift’s fire hall did not count as hours worked for purposes of overtime compensation. The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership