Logourl black

Skinner v. Oklahoma

United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 535 (1942)


Facts

An Oklahoma statute, the Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act, allows the forced sterilization of any “habitual criminal” within the state. The statute defines a “habitual criminal” as a person who, having been convicted two or more times for crimes “amounting to felonies involving moral turpitude” either in Oklahoma court or in a court of any other state, is thereafter convicted of such a felony in Oklahoma and sentenced to prison within Oklahoma. Skinner (defendant) was convicted in 1926 of stealing chickens and sentenced to prison in Oklahoma. In 1929, Skinner was convicted of robbery with firearms and sentenced to prison. In 1934, he was convicted again of robbery with firearms and again incarcerated in Oklahoma. He was confined there in 1935 when the Sterilization Act was passed, and in 1936, the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, (plaintiff) instituted proceedings against him. Skinner challenged the act as unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. At his jury trial in Oklahoma state court, the court instructed the jury to consider only whether a vasectomy would be detrimental to Skinner’s health. The jury answered in the negative. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma affirmed a judgment directing that a vasectomy be performed on Skinner. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Stone, C.J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 89,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,195 briefs - keyed to 164 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now