From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...
Skinner v. Square D Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
516 N.W.2d 475 (1994)
Chester Skinner built a tumbling machine used to clean and finish metal parts. Power to the machine was controlled by a switch manufactured by Square D Company (defendant). The switch was connected to the machine’s motor by wires with “alligator clips” on the ends. Operation of the machine required manually reversing the direction of a rotating drum, which Skinner or a coworker did by shutting off the switch, disconnecting two alligator clips from the motor, and reversing them. Whenever the machine was on and hooked up, it either rotated or made noise. In February 1986, Skinner was working alone when his wife and two other women in the next room heard him call out. They found him holding an alligator clip in each hand with live current flowing through him. Skinner was able to remove one clip and flip the switch to the off position. He then died. Representatives of his estate (plaintiffs) sued Square D, contending that its switch was defective in that it did not always indicate clearly whether it was on or off. Plaintiffs alleged that such defect caused Skinner’s death. They presented evidence that Skinner was a careful worker, and they theorized that the accident resulted when the machine was on but the wires were unconnected so that the machine was not moving or making noise to indicate it was live; Skinner was thus led to believe by the defective switch and the state of the machine that it was not on. Square D moved for summary disposition, contending that even if the switch was defective, plaintiffs had failed to establish sufficient evidence that such defect caused Skinner’s death. The trial court granted Square D’s motion. Plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cavanagh, C.J.)
Dissent (Levin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 583,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 583,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.