Sklar v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
282 F.3d 610 (2002)
Michael and Marla Sklar (plaintiffs) paid tuition for their children’s education at a private religious school. Without explanation or proof, the Sklars claimed that 45 percent of the tuition was for a secular component equivalent to the value of secular education in a public school, and that the other 55 percent was for a religious component. The Sklars claimed a charitable-contribution tax deduction under § 170 of the federal tax code for the religious component of the tuition. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) disallowed the deduction. The Sklars filed a petition challenging the disallowance, and the tax court ruled for the commissioner. The Sklars appealed again.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.